latmonitor.blogg.se - Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark pro#
#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark Bluetooth#
#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark mac#

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark pro#

You’ll have to find some benchmarking for that and of course evaluate if you’re going to need the extra power or the expandability is better.“Here the 8-core and 10-core iMac Pros running additional pro apps compared to competing Macs,” Rob Art Morgan writes for Bare Feats.

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark mac#

Get the Mac Pro if you’re going to develop and already have screens (or the budget to buy them), because in the future, when you want your time machine, your drive cloned, more space, etc., the Mac Pro is going to be much more helpful than stacking fragile external Firewire/USB drives.Īccording to the experts ( tegeril), the “ ATI 2600 Pro is a substantially superior card to the Nvidia 7300GT”. I don’t know if you’ll find an exact comparison between those two models, but you might come up with something similar. It’s usually filled with good impressions and comments and sometimes comparisons. I suggest you visit Anandtech’s Mac section if you want some benchmarks and reviews. But of course, a normal World of Warcraft user wouldn’t even use 5% of all that. I notice that the MultiCore is godsend sometimes, you see processes hanging there at 100% and the rest of the CPUs and cores take care. Sadly, I need storage, redundancy and multi-core for some of the things I do for a living, so the 8 cores of my Mac Pro are needed in my case.

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark Bluetooth#

The iMac on the other hand, is a beautiful looking machine that if you use paired with a lot of BlueTooth stuff, makes your desk look very pristine. My Mac Pro is going to turn 3 years soon and it works fantastically. I wouldn’t change my Mac Pro (early 2008) for a new iMac, because I already have two 27’’ screens, already have 4 drives in there (with some RAID going on) + an SSD for the OS and I have replaced the stock video card (NVIDIA) with an ATI (because my nVidia Failed and the ATI costed the same as the out of warranty nVIdia).

Both machines have enough USB/FW ports I believe, tho the Mac Pro surely has some more, you will need more ports in the iMac if you use external drives (not that you have much choice there).

The CONS here is that if you don’t like Glossy Displays… you’re out of luck :)Īll these things don’t really change your day to day workflow, yes, some Front Side Buses are faster than others, but in the end, the difference is probably not a decision factor.

The MacPro, will need displays (and webcams). You’re stuck with a very nice 24 inch display and an integrated iSight.

You can’t change or add another video card. You could add more cards to your MacPro for more than two displays if that’s what you want. MP: Tho I don’t know if the NVIDA is better than that particular ATI (tho I believe it is), the expandability of the MP is superior to the zero expandability of the iMac.Some “hacks” exist to replace the superdrive with another drive, but I don’t know if that Model fits. iM: close to impossible (unless you have the right tools, time, patience and dedication) to change the internal drive, which is a “slower” 2.5 drive if I am not mistaken.Very easy to add/remove drives and to create a simple RAID1 if you wanna have a mirror “just in case”.

MP: Although “external” drives are “ok”, having four internal SATA bays is godsend.

iM(iMac): Probably more limited, tho not harder to change as far as I can remember, but if you need 12 GB you can’t achieve that with that (or any AFAICR) iMac.

MP(MacPro): Very easy to add and the limit is probably higher than what you can/Want to afford for the task you want to perform.

I’d say that it would be better if you consider the following differences: Your question is somewhat difficult to answer, because not all is based upon “raw” performance.